Banner Advertising's Effectiveness
As A Marketing Tool
Are banners effective or have they totally lost their
appeal? Some say banner advertising never really had
an
appeal on a medium that relies on the user doing the
navigating rather than the medium calling the shots.
Anyway, don't Internet users access the Internet through
Search Engines rather than through advertising? Banner
advertising went through stages since its inception
to become a marketing tool that motivates people to
action instead of merely an informational tool like
a print ad or web site.
On the Internet, banners are everywhere. What makes
advertisers think tons of exposure will move someone
to click-through? Are advertisers hoping for product
recognition? Sadly, research shows Internet users
start to tune out banners and treat it like background
noise. However, Internet marketing services still
claim banner advertising can work if done right and
in the right places.
Banner advertising that does work has to be in the
right place, at the right time where the Internet
user is most receptive to that banner's message. It
has to get right in front of the viewer's face and
catch their attention in a positive and not annoying
way. Some ways that advertisers are finding banner
advertising useful is by employing animation. Animation
can get attention, but keeps the viewers eyes moving
and can just become an annoying distraction. Another
way to use a banner effectively is to pose a useful
question like if you do [such and such] then you get
an additional [such and such]. Banners can also offer
freebees. Everyone loves a freebie, without a catch.
For instance, offer a chance in a drawing or a free
trial offer. Banners that position themselves to do
more than inform create a desire that the viewer wants
to act upon.
What does the exposure from banner advertising online
achieve? Does the banner draw in lots of traffic or
visitors willing to buy? The banner must attract the
right target audience that is receptive to performing
a click-through and then purchasing. Where the users
of the 1990s didn't think twice about following a
banner to a new location, today's Internet user is
more discriminatory and suspicious of banner's so-called
gimmicks such as freebies.
Another reason banners fall short of their expectations
is more Internet users are ignoring or blocking banners
to avoid the risk of identity theft, ad ware, spy
ware, and other goodies that often lurk behind the
attractive banner. This skepticism is causing many
website creators to find more creative ways to get
across messages about their location than through
banners that are perceived as destructive or invasive
to one's computer.
According to some studies, a website has 8 seconds
or less to seize a visitor's attention before he either
decides to stick around or leave. If a banner slows
down the loading time, many website owners will opt
out on certain banners rather than risk loosing buying
customers.
Since many banners mean extra income to many websites
if the visitor clicks-through, many website owners
prefer to use simpler banner ads to flashy, complicated
ones and will discontinue using certain banners if
visitors find it annoying. What does an advertiser
consider effective when it comes to Internet advertising
anyway? Is the ad effective if people click on the
banner or effective if sales increase as direct result
of the banner ad? The measure of its effectiveness
is sort of hit and miss. Much the effectiveness depends
on the banner's total campaign and goals of the advertiser.
Copyright 2005 Riki Trafford. All rights reserved.
Riki Trafford is the webmaster of Direct MO Marketing
Inc.
Please follow this
link for more articles from Riki Trafford and
his web address.